2021 Dry Bulk Outlook

In the following weeks Klaveness Research will in a series of articles have a look at how we believe the fundamentals impacting dry bulk freight rates are shaping up for 2021.

In this first article we start by having a look at the big picture. In subsequent reports we will drill further down into the major dry bulk commodity groups of iron ore, coal, grains and minor bulks before we finish of with looking at the supply side.

The big picture

Dry bulk freight was in a super cycle between 2001 and 2008 as the growth in global yard capacity was unable to keep up with the seaborne demand growth triggered by China joining the World Trade Organization in 2001. Between 2008 and 2016 the general trend in dry bulk freight was negative as global fleet growth reached unprecedented levels. The dry bulk market bottomed out in Q1-2016 and has since been trending upwards. However, the black swan events of the Brumadinho dam disaster and COVID-19 stalled the recovery in 2019 and 2020. The Brumadinho dam disaster was a negative shock for the dry bulk market as the long-distance iron ore export out of Brazil contracted about 13%* year on year (yoy) in 2019. The Brazilian iron ore export has been trending higher in recent months and is expected to climb further in 2021 and 2022. Total seaborne iron ore export volume is up 4.3% year to date (ytd) due to strong export growth in Australia and in other minor export countries.

The black swan event of the COVID-19 pandemic has greatly reduced global industrial production for most of 2020 and has had a negative impact on the demand for coal and minor bulks. The first chart below shows our metric on Global Dry Bulk Import weighted PMI vs the Baltic Dry Index. We calculate this metric by weighting the Purchase Manufacturing Indices (PMI) of the largest dry bulk importing countries and regions in the world with the size of the corresponding dry bulk import in the previous calendar year. A reading above 50 indicates expanding global dry bulk demand while a reading below 50 indicates contracting global dry bulk demand. As we entered 2020, the general trend in this metric was positive, but from February this gauge nosedived and bottomed out in April. Since then global PMIs have been improving but has only been in expansion mode in the last three months. As seen in the bubble graph below, most of the important dry bulk countries are in expansion mode as of September, except for Japan, South Korea and Mexico. It is also clearly visible how vital China is for dry bulk demand, and – perhaps surprising to some – it also shows the relative low importance of the USA in terms of dry bulk demand.

Coal and minor bulk export volumes are down 10% and 6% respectively in the first nine months of 2020. We strongly believe that the negative effect of COVID-19 will be less severe in 2021, and thus expect the demand for coal and minor bulks to rebound.

The global seaborne trade of grains and bauxite has seen strong growth numbers so far in 2020. Total grain export volumes are up 6% ytd September, according to our numbers. Bauxite volumes are up almost 14%. The long-distance grain trade is expected to increase marginally from a high base in 2021, while the increasingly long distanced bauxite trade is widely anticipated to continue its strong growth.

Global steel production, China vs the rest of the world

Global steel production is highly correlated with global industrial production and has thus been negatively impacted by COVID-19. The demand for iron ore, coking coal and many of the minor bulks are directly linked to global steel production. Global steel production is down 4.1% in the first nine months of the year and this has without doubt had a negative effect on the demand for minor bulks and coking coal. However, as mentioned earlier in the article, the seaborne export of iron ore is up more than 4% ytd in a period where global steel production is down more than 4%. How is that possible?

The answer to this question is, to a large extent, that while steel production in the World excluding China is down 13.3% ytd, Chinese steel production is up is up 4.1% ytd. With more than 75% of total iron ore export ytd destined for China, the growth in demand in China more than offsets the drop in demand outside of China. While China is also an important player in the demand for other dry bulk commodities, their market share is no way near what we see in iron ore. The market share in the minor bulk and coal trade is about 20% for both groups. Thus, for these commodities, what happens outside of China is collectively more important than what happens inside of China, and this explains why these commodities has posted negative growth numbers ytd while the iron ore trade has been growing.

Next week we will take a closer look at how the fundamental drivers for iron ore is shaping up for 2021. In subsequent reports we will take a closer look at the other commodity groups (coal, grains, minor bulks and bauxite) before we finish up the series with a look on the supply side.

In the meantime, don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding the content of this report or to discuss how we can help you manage your dry bulk exposure.

Peter Lindström, Head of Klaveness Research
Email pel@klaveness.com

*all trade growth numbers in this article is derived from our in-house analytical platform unless another source is explicitly mentioned.

Will iron ore export be able to meet demand?

In the following weeks Klaveness Research will in a series of articles have a look at how we believe the fundamentals impacting dry bulk freight rates are shaping up for 2021. This is the second article of the series.

In the first article, we started off by having a look at the big picture. In this second we will drill further into the details of the fundamental drivers for iron ore, which is the single biggest dry bulk commodity. In subsequent reports we will drill further down into the other major dry bulk commodity groups of coal, grains, bauxite and minor bulks before we finish off with a look at the supply side.

The link between the Iron Ore Trade and Dry Bulk Freight rates

The iron ore share in total dry bulk trade measured by volume was 32%* in 2019 and was as such the largest commodity group. The demand for vessels cannot simply be derived from volume - we need to take distance and trade inefficiencies into account as well - as time spent on the total transport work is what ultimately impacts the aggregated demand for vessels. A widely used metric in the shipping industry is ton-mile, which simply is tonnes carried * distance traveled. This is a better gauge for vessel demand than only looking at tons carried, but in Klaveness Research we prefer another measure - Dwt x Duration - which looks at the total time spent on the transport work and multiplies this with the carrying capacity of the vessel. We believe this is a better way to measure the demand for vessels a some of the inefficiencies on the various trades are captured, such as congestion. The measure also factors in the effect of stowage factor on vessel intake. If we measure the iron ore share in total dry bulk trade by using the Dwt x Duration metric, we end up with a 31% market share* in 2019. In the first nine month of 2020 the market share of iron ore has increased another percentage point.

If we break it down by segment, we clearly see that the iron ore transport work is unevenly distributed among the sizes. While iron ore constituted 72% of the Cape demand in 2019, the market share quickly drops as we move down the sizes with Panamaxes at 7%, Supramaxes at 4% and Handies at a meager 1%.

Iron ore’s high market share in Capesize demand makes the link between the seaborne iron ore trade volumes and Capesize freight rates direct and intuitive. However - maybe less intuitively - the iron ore trade also has a big impact on freight rates in the smaller segments, through substitution effects. Due to economies of scale the Capesize segment can normally offer the cheapest freight on a per ton basis. This is the reason why Capesize is preferred carrier of iron ore and coal on trade routes which have the necessary infrastructure to accommodate these large vessels. The fact that the cape fleet is so dependent on one single commodity group makes it the most volatile segment in terms of freight. High iron ore volumes increase cape utilization, higher utilization leads to higher freight rate which from time to time makes Panamax freight less expensive on a per ton basis. When this happens, we often see cape splits, which typically means that one Capesize vessel is substituted with two Panamax vessels. Somewhat ironically these cape splits seldom occur on the iron ore trade but on the coal trades. Cape splits leads to higher Panamax freight rates which again can make Supramax/Ultramaxes cheaper than Panamaxes on a per ton basis, which means cargo volume is cascaded down into the geared segment.

Iron ore demand

Steel is primarily produced using one of two methods: Blast Furnace or Electric Arc Furnace. 98%** of the mined iron ore is linked to blast furnace steel production which uses coke, iron ore and limestone to produce pig iron. The competing Electric Arc Furnace method uses scrap steel and electricity to produce molten steel.

As we touched upon in the previous article the biggest iron ore importer in the world is by far China. China’s market share in global steel production year to date is 58%. The fact that more than 90% of Chinese steel production is based on the blast furnace method, while the percentage for the rest of the world is around 55% (2019 data is not available) means that China’s demand for iron ore exceeds the Chinese share in global steel production. Combined with a low quality in the domestic iron ore, the vast majority of China’s demand is covered through imports. 71% of all seaborne export of iron ore in 2019 was destined for China. In the first 9 months of this year the market share of China has increased further to 76% as steel production in the country has increased 3.9% year on year while steel production in the rest of the world collectively is down 13.3%.

Covid-19 has without doubt impacted steel demand and production in the world outside of China negatively. Although we currently see a resurgence in global infections in the Western World we believe it is likely that the adverse effects from Covid-19 on global industrial production will be less in 2021 compared to this year, either through vaccines or through increased knowledge about how to keep the wheels turning while at the same time keeping the virus under control. Thus, we believe that steel production will grow in the world outside of China in 2021 and that the magnitude of the growth will be negatively correlated with the growth rates in Covid-19 hospitalizations.

Chinese steel demand had a week start of the year as the economy was hit by Covid-19. After suppressing the spread of the virus within the country, the Chinese government has initiated a series of big infrastructure investments to stimulate the economy. The positive effect of these investments will last well into the new calendar year, but it is difficult to assess the growth rates for Chinese steel production for 2021 as a whole.

All in all the demand growth in ore demand for next year is uncertain, but in our view likely to be positive.

However, we firmly believe that what happens on the demand side for iron ore is of less importance inn 2021. The reason is that the iron ore market currently is in a large deficit, something which is clearly reflected in the current spot rates and future prices of iron ore. Hence, we believe that there will be a buyer in 2021 for every ton of decent quality iron ore that is produced. Thus, it is the growth rates in iron ore supply which will be of importance in 2021.

Iron ore Supply

Australia is by far the largest iron ore exporter in the world with a 53% market share in global export in 2019, followed by Brazil in second place at 21%. If we use our Dwt x Duration metric we see a different picture where Brazil at 37% is equally important for dry bulk vessel demand as Australia. While all other exporters are marginal with an accumulated market share of 25%.

The Brumadinho dam disaster was a negative shock for the dry bulk market as the long-distance iron ore export out of Brazil contracted about 13%* year on year (yoy) in 2019. The Brazilian iron ore export has a seasonality where exports tends to start off at low pace in Q1 due to adverse weather before increasing through the year, a pattern that coincides with the seasonality in the Capesize freight market. This year’s Q1 suffered from torrential rain which together with the prevailing negative effects from the Brumadinho disaster resulted in the weakest Q1 export performance since 2015. Since then the Brazilian iron ore export has been trending higher resulting in year to date exports on par with last year. Vale has clear ambitions to increase their production from about 310Mt in 2020 to 400Mt in a couple of years’ time. We believe that the ton mile intensive iron ore export from Brazil will increase in the region of 20-30Mt in 2021.

Australian iron ore export has had a strong growth of 4.9% in volumes year to date. Measured by our Volume x Duration metric the performance has been even better at +7.7%.

At the time of writing the Nov-20 iron ore contract for 62% iron ore CFR China is trading at 112$/ton. The average of the future curves for 2021 is 98$/ton. Both the spot price and the future prices are way above the cost curve of both the major and the minor Australian mining companies. Thus the incentive to increase supply is clearly evident and we believe it is likely that the iron ore producers in Australia will be able to increase their export in 2021 with at least 20-30Mt.

Iron ore export in the rest of the world is up close to 30% year to date on the back of soaring iron ore prices. This is largely due to a 65% year on year increase in Indian export. This is one of the few areas where Supramaxes has benefited directly from higher iron ore export due to a 82% market share in shipments.

If we also exclude India from the rest of the world numbers then export in the rest of the world is up a meager 1.7%. We expect iron ore export outside of Australia and Brazil to grow in the coming year as future prices are well above their cost curves.

Altogether we believe that it is very likely that we will see a ramp up in global iron ore export in 2020. With Brazil as a big contributor in the expected volume growth this should have a substantial positive contribution on dry bulk fleet utilization, in particular in the Capesize segment but also in the smaller segments through substitution effects.

Next week we will take a closer look at how the fundamental drivers for coal is shaping up for 2021. In subsequent reports we will take a closer look at the other commodity groups (grains, minor bulks and bauxite) before we finish up the series with a look on the supply side.

In the meantime, don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding the content of this report or to discuss how we can help you manage your dry bulk exposure.

Peter Lindström, Head of Research
pel@klaveness.com

**Source: Wikipedia

Interested in subscribing to similar news? Sign up here